When someone sustains an injury caused by the negligent actions of another party, preexisting injuries or conditions that the victim may have can be exasperated or reaggravated. Even though pre-existing conditions and injuries shouldn’t affect a person’s ability to file an injury claim against an at-fault party, inevitably, they will play a role.
That is where the Eggshell Skull Rule comes into play. Individuals seeking to recover compensation from negligent parties should not have their claim adversely affected because of a pre-existing condition that may have been made worse. The Eggshell Skull Rule, though it may have a funny name, helps to protect injury victims in these scenarios.
The Eggshell Skull Rule, also known as the Eggshell Plaintiff Rule, originates from common law principles. According to the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, this legal doctrine holds that a defendant is responsible for a victim’s unforeseeable and uncommon reactions to the defendant’s negligent or intentional actions. Essentially, this means that if a person has a condition that makes them more susceptible to injury, the person who caused the harm is fully liable for all the consequences, even if the injuries are more severe than what might be expected in a typical person.
In layman’s terms, the Eggshell Skull Rule ensures that the vulnerability of the victim does not absolve the wrongdoer of responsibility. The term itself comes from a hypothetical scenario where a person with an “eggshell” thin skull suffers a severe injury from a blow that would not harm someone with a normal skull.
The Eggshell Skull Rule is particularly significant in personal injury cases. Here is how it typically applies:
Numerous court cases have upheld the Eggshell Skull Rule, reinforcing its importance in personal injury law. One such case is Vosburg v. Putney, where a minor kick to the shin resulted in severe injury due to the victim’s pre-existing condition. The court held that the defendant was fully liable for the extensive injuries caused, despite the seemingly minor nature of the initial act.
Another notable case is Smith v. Leech Brain & Co, where a minor burn led to cancer in a worker with a pre-existing susceptibility. The court ruled that the employer was responsible for the worker’s death, emphasizing that a defendant must “take their victim as they find them.”
Navigating the complexities of personal injury claims involving pre-existing conditions can be challenging. This is why having an experienced St. Petersburg personal injury attorney is crucial. A knowledgeable lawyer can:
The Eggshell Skull Rule plays a vital role in personal injury law by ensuring that individuals with pre-existing conditions receive fair compensation for their injuries. This legal doctrine reinforces the principle that wrongdoers must take their victims as they find them, fully accounting for any vulnerabilities or pre-existing conditions.
For those dealing with the aftermath of an injury exacerbated by someone else’s negligence, understanding the protections offered by the Eggshell Skull Rule is crucial. If you or a loved one finds yourselves in such a situation, consulting with a skilled personal injury attorney can help you navigate the complexities of your case and secure the compensation you deserve.